Communications Between Predecessor and Successor Auditors

Communications Between precursor and substitute Auditors 155 AU S el electroshock therapyroshock therapyion 315 Communications Between antecedent and alternate Auditors (Supersedes SAS none 7. ) Source SAS zero(prenominal) 84 SAS No. 93. Effective with find to eat upance of an delectation afterward March 31, 1998, unless or so otherwise indicated. Introduction .01 This separate pull up stakess guidance on conference theory between precursor and alternate tenders when a wobble of tenders is in process or has taken place. It also provides communication theory guidance when possible misstatements argon discovered in ? ancial statements conveyed on by a harbinger tender. This slit applies whenever an independent hearer is filchsidering prise an dispute to analyse or re scrutinize (see paragraph . 14 of this plane segment) ? nancial statements in concord with mainly accepted analyzeing standards, and after much(prenominal) listener has been appointed to behave such(prenominal) an meshing. .02 For the purposes of this section, the term herald listener refers to an attendant who (a) has revealed on the most new-fashioned canvassed ? nancial statements1 or was engaged to behave but did non complete an audit of the ? ancial statements2 and (b) has resigned, declined to stand for reappointment, or been noni? ed that his or her work have been, or whitethorn be, terminated. The term alternate listener refers to an meeter who is considering accepting an engagement to audit ? nancial statements but has not communicated with the trumpeter tender as provided in paragraphs . 07 with . 10 and to an meeter who has accepted such an engagement. As amended, effective for audits of ? nancial statements for plosive consonants ending on or after June 30, 2001, by avouchment on Auditing Standards No. 3. Change of Auditors .03 An listener should not accept an engagement until the communications draw in paragraphs . 07 t hrough . 10 have been evaluated. 3 However, an meeter whitethorn make a proposal for an audit engagement before communicating with the harbinger attender. The meeter may bid to project the prospective 1 The provisions of this section are not mandatory if the most recent audited ? nancial statements are more than two years preliminary to the beginning of the earliest distributor point to be audited by the surrogate auditor. on that point may be two forerunner auditors the auditor who reported on the most recent audited ? nancial statements and the auditor who was engaged to perform but did not complete an audit of any subsequent ? nancial statements. As amended, effective for audits of ? nancial statements for periods ending on or after June 30, 2001, by asseveration on Auditing Standards No. 93. 3 When the most recent ? nancial statements have been compiled or freshened in conformance with the assertions on Standards for Accounting and Review Services, the accountant who reported on those ? ancial statements is not a predecessor auditor. Although not unavoidable by this section, in these mass the replacing auditor may ? nd the effects described in paragraphs . 08 and . 09 aimful in find out whether to accept the engagement. AU 315. 03 156 The Standards of Field Work knob (for example, in a proposal) that acceptance cannot be ? nal until the communications have been evaluated. .04 some other communications between the replenishment and predecessor auditors, described in paragraph . 11, are advisable to embolden in the aimning of the engagement.However, the timing of these other communications is more ? exible. The refilling auditor may initiate these other communications either front to acceptance of the engagement or subsequent thereto. .05 When more than one auditor is considering accepting an engagement, the predecessor auditor should not be expected to be ready(prenominal) to respond to inquiries until a heir auditor has been selected by the prospective lymph gland and has accepted the engagement subject to the military rank of the communications with the predecessor auditor as provided in paragraphs . 07 through . 10. 06 The scuttle for communicating rests with the refilling auditor. The communication may be either create verbally or oral. Both the predecessor and replenishment auditors should hold in con? dence selective tuition ruleed from each other. This obligation applies whether or not the alternate auditor accepts the engagement. Communications Before Successor Auditor Accepts Engagement .07 Inquiry of the predecessor auditor is a unavoidable procedure beca utilize the predecessor auditor may be able to provide breeding that leave behind assist the refilling auditor in determining whether to accept the engagement.The renewal auditor should ingest in mind that, among other things, the predecessor auditor and the invitee may have disagreed about accounting principles, auditing pro cedures, or similarly signi? cant matters. .08 The successor auditor should implore permission from the prospective client to make an interrogatory of the predecessor auditor previous to ? nal acceptance of the engagement. Except as go forted by the Rules of the Code of Professional Conduct, an auditor is precluded from disclosing con? dential information pay offed in the programme of an engagement unless the client speci? cally consents.Thus, the successor auditor should ask the prospective client to authorize the predecessor auditor to respond fully to the successor auditors inquiries. If a prospective client ref aims to permit the predecessor auditor to respond or limits the response, the successor auditor should inquire as to the reasons and consider the implications of that refusal in decision making whether to accept the engagement. .09 The successor auditor should make speci? c and tenable inquiries of the predecessor auditor regarding matters that get out assist the successor auditor in determining whether to accept the engagement.Matters subject to inquiry should include Information that might comprise on the integrity of management. Disagreements with management as to accounting principles, auditing procedures, or other similarly signi? cant matters. Communications to those charged with governance regarding fraud and amerciable acts by clients. 4 4 Footnote deleted to re? ect conforming changes necessary due(p) to the military let out of argument on Auditing Standards No. 114. AU 315. 04 Communications Between Predecessor and Successor Auditors 157 Communications to management and those charged with governance regarding signi? ant de? ciencies and literal weaknesses in internal control. 5 The predecessor auditors regarding as to the reasons for the change of auditors. The successor auditor may attentiveness to consider other liable inquiries. Revised, whitethorn 2006, to re? ect conforming changes necessary due to the publi cation of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 112. Revised, April 2007, to re? ect conforming changes necessary due to the issuance of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114. . 10 The predecessor auditor should respond promptly and fully, on the basis of known facts, to the successor auditors reasonable inquiries.However, should the predecessor auditor decide, due to unusual circumstances such as impending, threatened, or potential judicial proceeding disciplinary proceedings or other unusual circumstances, not to respond fully to the inquiries, the predecessor auditor should clearly state that the response is express mail. If the successor auditor receives a limited response, its implications should be considered in deciding whether to accept the engagement. Other Communications .11 The successor auditor should request that the client authorize the predecessor auditor to get a recapitulation of the predecessor auditors work ideas.The predecessor auditor may wish to request a consent and acknowledgment letter from the client to memorial this authorization in an effort to reduce mis sagacitys about the mount of the communications being authorized. 6 It is customary in such circumstances for the predecessor auditor to make himself or herself available to the successor auditor and make available for review certain of the working(a)s document. The predecessor auditor should determine which working paper are to be made available for review and which may be copied.The predecessor auditor should ordinarily permit the successor auditor to review working written document, including documentation of planning, internal control, audit results, and other matters of continuing accounting and auditing signi? cance, such as the working paper analysis of balance sheet accounts, and those relating to contingencies. Also, the predecessor auditor should reach an understanding with the successor auditor as to the use of the working papers. 7 The point, if any, to whi ch a predecessor auditor permits entrance to the working papers is a matter of judgment.Successor Auditors Use of Communications .12 The successor auditor mustiness obtain suf? cient appropriate audit evidence to afford a reasonable basis for expressing an opinion on the ? nancial statements he or she has been engaged to audit, including evaluating the symmetry of the application of accounting principles. The audit evidence used in analyzing the tinge of the opening balances on the flow rate-year ? nancial statements and consistency of accounting principles is a matter of paid judgment. Such audit evidence may include the most recent audited ? ancial 5 See section 316, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit section 317, Illegal Acts by Clients and section 325, Communicating Internal Control Related Matters Identi? ed in an Audit. Footnote revised, May 2006, to re? ect conforming changes necessary due to the issuance of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 112. 6 Appendix A paragraph . 24 contains an illustrative client consent and acknowledgment letter. 7 Before permitting approaching to the working papers, the predecessor auditor may wish to obtain a written communication from the successor auditor regarding the use of the working papers.Appendix B paragraph . 25 contains an illustrative successor auditor acknowledgment letter. AU 315. 12 158 The Standards of Field Work statements, the predecessor auditors report thereon,8 the results of inquiry of the predecessor auditor, the results of the successor auditors review of the predecessor auditors working papers relating to the most recently completed audit, and audit procedures performed on the current periods transactions that may provide evidence about the opening balances or consistency.For example, evidence gathered during the current years audit may provide information about the realizability and existence of receivables and inventory recorded at the beginning of the year. The success or auditor may also harbor appropriate auditing procedures to account balances at the beginning of the period under audit and to transactions in prior periods. As amended, effective for audits of ? nancial statements for periods ending on or after June 30, 2001, by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 93.Revised, March 2006, to re? ect conforming changes necessary due to the issuance of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 105. . 13 The successor auditors review of the predecessor auditors working papers may affect the nature, timing, and extent of the successor auditors procedures with respect to the opening balances and consistency of accounting principles. However, the nature, timing, and extent of audit work performed and the conclusions reached in both these areas are only when the responsibility of the successor auditor.In reporting on the audit, the successor auditor should not make seed to the report or work of the predecessor auditor as the basis, in part, for the success or auditors own opinion. Audits of Financial Statements That Have Been Previously Audited . 14 If an auditor is asked to audit and report on ? nancial statements that have been previously audited and reported on (henceforth referred to as a reaudit), the auditor considering acceptance of the reaudit engagement is also a successor auditor, and the auditor who previously reported is also a predecessor auditor.In addition to the communications described in paragraphs . 07 through . 10, the successor auditor should state that the purpose of the inquiries is to obtain information about whether to accept an engagement to perform a reaudit. .15 If the successor auditor accepts the reaudit engagement, he or she may consider the information obtained from inquiries of the predecessor auditor and review of the predecessor auditors report and working papers in planning the reaudit. However, the information obtained from those inquiries and any review of the predecessor auditors report and worki ng papers is not suf? ient to afford a basis for expressing an opinion. The nature, timing, and extent of the audit work performed and the conclusions reached in the reaudit are solely the responsibility of the successor auditor performing the reaudit. .16 The successor auditor should plan and perform the reaudit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. The successor auditor should not assume responsibility for the predecessor auditors work or issue a report that re? ects divided responsibility as described in section 543, Part of Audit Performed by Other free-lance Auditors.Furthermore, the predecessor auditor is not a specialist as de? ned in section 336, Using the Work of a Specialist, or an internal auditor as de? ned in section 322, The Auditors Consideration of the Internal Audit liaison in an Audit of Financial Statements. .17 If the successor auditor has audited the current period, the results of that audit may be considered in planning and performing the reaudit of the 8 The successor auditor may wish to make inquiries about the professional composition and standing of the predecessor auditor.See section 543, Part of Audit Performed by Other Independent Auditors, paragraph . 10a. AU 315. 13 Communications Between Predecessor and Successor Auditors 159 preceding period or periods and may provide audit evidence that is useful in performing the reaudit. Revised, March 2006, to re? ect conforming changes necessary due to the issuance of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 105. . 18 If, in a reaudit engagement, the successor auditor is unable to obtain suf? cient appropriate audit evidence to express an opinion on the ? nancial tatements, the successor auditor should qualify or disclaim an opinion because of the inability to perform procedures the successor auditor considers necessary in the circumstances. Revised, March 2006, to re? ect conforming changes necessary due to the issuance of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 105. . 19 The successor auditor should request working papers for the period or periods under reaudit and the period prior to the reaudit period. However, the extent, if any, to which the predecessor auditor permits access to the working papers is a matter of judgment. See paragraph . 11 of this section. ) . 20 In a reaudit, the successor auditor generally will be unable to observe inventory or make carnal counts at the reaudit date or dates in the manner discussed in paragraphs . 09 through . 11 of section 331, Inventories. In such cases, the successor auditor may consider the knowledge obtained from his or her review of the predecessor auditors working papers and inquiries of the predecessor auditor to determine the nature, timing, and extent of procedures to be applied in the circumstances.The successor auditor performing the reaudit should, if material, observe or perform some physical counts of inventory at a date subsequent to the period of the reaudit, in connection with a current aud it or otherwise, and apply appropriate tests of intervening transactions. Appropriate procedures may include tests of prior transactions, reviews of records of prior counts, and the application of analytical procedures, such as gross pro? t tests. stripping of Possible Misstatements in Financial Statements Reported on by a Predecessor Auditor . 21 If during the audit or reaudit, the successor auditor becomes aware of information that leads him or her to believe that ? nancial statements reported on by the predecessor auditor may require revision, the successor auditor should request that the client inform the predecessor auditor of the situation and arrange for the ternion parties to discuss this information and attempt to resolve the matter.The successor auditor should communicate to the predecessor auditor any information that the predecessor auditor may need to consider in accordance with section 561, Subsequent Discovery of Facts Existing at the Date of the Auditors Report, whi ch sets out the procedures that an auditor should follow when the auditor subsequently discovers facts that may have affected the audited ? nancial statements previously reported on. 9 . 22 If the client refuses to inform the predecessor auditor or if the successor auditor is not satis? d with the resolution of the matter, the successor auditor should evaluate (a) possible implications on the current engagement and (b) whether to resign from the engagement. Furthermore, the successor auditor may wish to consult with his or her legal counsel in determining an appropriate course of further action. Effective Date .23 This section will be effective with respect to acceptance of an engagement after March 31, 1998. Earlier application is permitted. 9 See section 508, Reports on Audited Financial Statements, paragraphs . 70 through . 74, for reporting guidance. AU 315. 23 one hundred sixty .24The Standards of Field Work Appendix A illustrative Client consent and Acknowledgment Letter 1. Paragraph . 11 of this section states, The successor auditor should request that the client authorize the predecessor auditor to give up a review of the predecessor auditors working papers. The predecessor auditor may wish to request a consent and acknowledgment letter from the client to document this authorization in an effort to reduce misunderstandings about the scope of the communications being authorized. The following letter is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessary by professional standards. Date rudiment Enterprises Address You have give your consent to allow name of successor CPA ? rm, as successor independent auditors for ABC Enterprises (ABC), access to our working papers for our audit of the December 31, 19X1, ? nancial statements of ABC. You also have given your consent to us to respond fully to name of successor CPA ? rm inquiries. You understand and agree that the review of our working papers is undertaken solely for the purpose of obtaini ng an understanding about ABC and certain information about our audit to assist name of successor CPA ? m in planning the audit of the December 31, 19X2, ? nancial statements of ABC. amuse con? rm your agreement with the foregoing by signing and dating a copy of this letter and returning it to us. Attached is the form of the letter we will furnish name of successor CPA ? rm regarding the use of the working papers. Very rightfully yours, Predecessor Auditor By ___________________________ reliable ABC Enterprises By ___________________________ Date _________________ AU 315. 24 Communications Between Predecessor and Successor Auditors .25 161 Appendix B Illustrative Successor Auditor Acknowledgment Letter . Paragraph . 11, footnote 7, of this section states, Before permitting access to the working papers, the predecessor auditor may wish to obtain a written communication from the successor auditor regarding the use of the working papers. The following letter is presented for illust rative purposes only and is not required by professional standards. Successor Auditor Address We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the December 31, 20X1, ? nancial statements of ABC Enterprises (ABC). We rendered a report on those ? ancial statements and have not performed any audit procedures subsequent to the audit report date. In connection with your audit of ABCs 20X2 ? nancial statements, you have communicate access to our working papers disposed(p) in connection with that audit. ABC has authorized our ? rm to allow you to review those working papers. Our audit, and the working papers ready in connection therewith, of ABCs ? nancial statements were not planned or conducted in contemplation of your review. Therefore, items of possible interest to you may not have been speci? cally addressed. Our use of professional judgment and the assessment of audit risk nd corporality for the purpose of our au dit mean that matters may have existed that would have been assessed other than by you. We make no representation as to the suf? ciency or correctness of the information in our working papers for your purposes. We understand that the purpose of your review is to obtain information about ABC and our 19X1 audit results to assist you in planning your 19X2 audit of ABC. For that purpose only, we will provide you access to our working papers that relate to that objective. Upon request, we will provide copies of those working papers that provide factual information about ABC.You agree to subject any such copies or information otherwise derived from our working papers to your normal polity for retention of working papers and protection of con? dential client information. Furthermore, in the event of a third-party request for access to your working papers prepared in connection with your audits of ABC, you agree to obtain our permission before voluntarily allowing any such access to our wo rking papers or information otherwise derived from our working papers, and to obtain on our behalf any releases that you obtain from such third party.You agree to advise us promptly and provide us a copy of any subpoena, summons, or other court launch for access to your working papers that include copies of our working papers or information otherwise derived therefrom. Please con? rm your agreement with the foregoing by signing and dating a copy of this letter and returning it to us. AU 315. 25 162 Very truly yours, Predecessor Auditor The Standards of Field Work By ___________________________ Accepted Successor Auditor By ___________________________ Date __________________ Even with the clients consent, access to the predecessor auditors working papers may still be limited.Experience has shown that the predecessor auditor may be willing to grant broader access if given additional assurance concerning the use of the working papers. Accordingly, the successor auditor might consider agreeing to the following limitations on the review of the predecessor auditors working papers in order to obtain broader access The successor auditor will not translation, orally or in writing, to anyone as a result of the review as to whether the predecessor auditors engagement was performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.The successor auditor will not provide expert evidence or litigation support services or otherwise accept an engagement to comment on issues relating to the quality of the predecessor auditors audit. The successor auditor will not use the audit procedures or results thereof documented in the predecessor auditors working papers as audit evidence in reading an opinion on the 19X2 ? nancial statements of ABC Enterprises, except as contemplated in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 84. The following paragraph illustrates the aboveBecause your review of our working papers is undertaken solely for the purpose described above and may not entail a review of all our working papers, you agree that (1) the information obtained from the review will not be used by you for any other purpose, (2) you will not comment, orally or in writing, to anyone as a result of that review as to whether our audit was performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, (3) you will not provide expert testimony or litigation support services or otherwise accept an engagement to comment on issues relating to the quality of our audit, and (4) you will not use the audit procedures or results thereof documented in our working papers as audit evidence in rendering your opinion on the 19X2 ? nancial statements of ABC, except as contemplated in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 84. Revised, October 2000, to re? ect conforming changes necessary due to the issuance of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 93. Revised, March 2006, to re? ect conforming changes necessary due to the issuance of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 105. AU 315. 25